By Lorraine Chow via Eco Watch
Environmentalists celebrated the move as a victory for rainforests, the climate and endangered species such as orangutans that have lost their habitats due to palm oil production in Indonesia and Malaysia. It also sets a major precedent for other nations.
“The Norwegian parliament’s decision sets an important example to other countries and underlines the need for a serious reform of the world’s palm oil industry,” said Nils Hermann Ranum of the Rainforest Foundation Norway (RFN) in a press release emailed to EcoWatch.
A 2017 report commissioned by RFN found that palm oil-based biofuel is worse for the climate than fossil fuels. The report, authored by low carbon fuels policy expert Chris Malins, concludes: “There is a large body of evidence that because of indirect land use change, palm oil biodiesel is worse for the climate than the fossil fuel it replaces—perhaps several times worse.”
Norway’s consumption of palm oil-based fuels hit all-time high in 2017, according to RFN. The country consumed 317 million liters of palm-oil based biodiesel, representing 10 per cent of its overall diesel consumption, the group said.
As the #COP24 #climatechange summit opened, Norway made a bold move. #Biofuels based on high #deforestation risk feedstocks such as #palmoil will be excluded by 2020. This is a victory in the fight for the #rainforest and the climate, says @RainforestNORW https://t.co/R6kKAiCzlg pic.twitter.com/RIbmKEqAtk
— Rainforest Foundation Norway (@RainforestNORW) 6 grudnia 2018
Last year, a majority of the Norwegian parliament actually voted to stop the government from purchasing palm oil-based fuels.
However, the parliamentary decision was never fully implemented, as the government opted instead to rely on voluntary measures, The Independent noted.
The vote that passed Monday is thought to be stronger and was supported by the majority of the government, according to The Independent. The resolution calls on the government “to formulate a comprehensive proposal for policies and taxes in the biofuels policy in order to exclude biofuels with high deforestation risk.”
— Rainforest Alliance (@RnfrstAlliance) 11 czerwca 2016
The Indonesian government as well the country’s palm oil producers have already expressed concern about Norway’s vote this week.
“Although the impact will not be significant (on our exports), that will become a bad example for other countries,” Fadhil Hasan, the director for foreign affairs of the Indonesian Palm Oil Producers Association, told The Straits Times.
Oke Nurwan, director-general for foreign trade in Indonesia’s Trade Ministry, worried that other countries may follow in Norway’s footsteps.
“The policy will certainly amplify the negative impression about palm oil products,” he told the publication.
Over 5000 people have downloaded our free ebook “Growth Hacking Tips And Rituals For Optimal Living” CLICK HERE to get your free copy now
Here is the full text of the resolution that passed in Oslo this week, according to RFN’s translation:
“The majority [in Parliament] is concerned that indirect land use effects from palm oil production lead to deforestation. The majority therefore believes that the use of palm oil should be limited as much as possible. The majority points out that it is important to find solutions in order to limit and phase out palm oil, and the majority will follow developments closely. The majority therefore puts forward the following proposal:
“Stortinget [the Norwegian Parliament] requests that the Government formulate a comprehensive proposal for measures and taxes in the biofuels policy in order to exclude biofuels with high deforestation risk both within and outside the blending mandate. These framework conditions shall be put forward in conjunction with the national budget for 2020, and shall be introduced from 1 January 2020.”
IMAGE CREDIT: photomagically