by Susanne Posel
According to a report published in Nature, biodiversity thrives in periods of warming; however alarmists do not want this fact to be misconstrued with the dangerous conditions man-made global warming is creating across the planet.
Bálint Miklós, researcher at the Biodiversity and Climate Research Center in Germany believes that there is an underestimation of biodiversity loss when it comes to purveyors of the man-made global warming myth. By using genetics to identify a species, Miklós asserts that climate change disrupts a species natural ebb and flow which is directly tied to global warming.
The myth of biodiversity suffering because of man-made climate change stems from a World Wildlife Fund (WWF) blog that claimed the polar bear population was suffering due to man-made climate change. The claim of the drowning polar bears goes back to a federal study that was obviously doctored. The 2006 paper from the journal Polar Biology lacked any supporting evidence for its claims that “drowning-related deaths of polar bears may increase in the future if the observed trend of regression of pack ice and/or longer open-water periods continues.”
Biologist Charles Monnett, the lead scientist on the paper, who is currently working with the Interior Department’s Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement, found a polar bear carcass and then devised the story that became the claim that polar bears were drowning.
However, researchers with the Government of Numavat in April of 2012 the found that polar bear populations are estimated at 66% higher than climate change alarmists predicted.
Geoengineering has been touted as a way to combat the effects of global warming. However, this experiment has been instrumental in actually creating those effects which are redirected to blame the human population for participating in civilization.
However, in May of this year, it was found that chemtrails were polluting thunderclouds which is causing damage to the environment and the planet’s natural weather patterns.
The pollution drenched thunderclouds are most pervasive at night which causes warmer temperatures. The study asserts that these clouds do not reflect sunlight, but trap heat within them and cause global warming effects.
Severe droughts have plagued the US and are expected to continue through the next two decades. Using computer models, these predictions are based on statistical data with regard to sea surface temperatures. The National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) a federally funded agency agrees with the predictions.
One way to combat this phenomenon is to shoot salt water into clouds to create “oceans” in our skies. These clouds, it is believed, could reflect sunlight back out, thereby cooling the planet.
Researchers at the University of Washington suggest the idea of marine cloud brightening. Using this brightening to manipulate the earth’s weather patterns, according to these scientists, is of no concern as far as its impact on our natural environment.
Other efforts, such as cloud seeding , could be used to decrease the strength of hurricanes. By reflecting light away from the ocean surface, the theory is that these storms would pass over cooler water and not intensify. Drones could be used to spray seawater into the atmosphere, causing the clouds to thicken and last longer; thereby reflecting more sunlight out and weakening the tropical waters below.
Calculations suggest that this technique could lower the ocean’s surface temperature by several degrees, which would in tow lower the strength of a hurricane by potentially one Category.
For less than $5 billion annually, solar radiation management (SRM) could mimic the effects of a volcanic eruption with the use of sulfuric aerosols dispensed into the atmosphere. This scheme would not reduce CO2 levels, yet alter the temperature and precipitation levels across the globe.
Justifying the need for a cooling effect, David Keith, director of the Institute for Sustainable Energy, Environment and Economy is pushing the releasing of nanotechnology with sulfuric aerosols into the Earth’s atmosphere to reflect sunlight back out into space. Keith manages the million-dollar geoengineering research that is funded by Bill Gates and the Fund for Innovative Climate and Energy Research.
Alarmists are asserting that volcanic eruptions could double or triple current levels of the chemical elements bromine and chlorine in our stratosphere; as well as upper atmosphere depleting the ozone layer.
Solar engineering will directly amplify specific areas of study as the have chosen sulfuric dust the mimics the emissions of volcanoes. An intended consequences of solar geoengineering is the whitening of our skies because of the nano particles being released to reflect sunlight. Sulfate aerosols cause whiter daytime skies and sunset to glow brighter.
In a study published in the journal Remote Sensing , co-author Dr. Roy Spencer reported that real data from NASA’s Terra Satellite completely contradicts the assumptions made by climate change alarmists.
According to a press release , at the University of Alabama, Spencer said: “The satellite observations suggest there is much more energy lost to space during and after warming than the climate models show. There is a huge discrepancy between the data and the forecasts that is especially big over the oceans.”
Researchers with GEOMAR have surmised that man-made bromine and chlorine are being expelled by volcanoes into the atmosphere in two to three times the quantity produced by man. Because volcanic eruptions can be carried across the globe, these elemental explosions could lead to ozone layer depletion as well as impact the Arctic and Antarctic.
According to a study conducted by the International Energy Agency in 2011, the Arctic is currently cooling and the effects brought on by sulfuric aerosols would cause more damage to the planet’s natural ability to cycle through its temperature fluxuations.
The focus of solar geoengineering is in the Arctic where the alarmists theorize that the necessity is the greatest to combat the melting of the ice-sheets. However, their disregard for natural cycles of the earth and the cyclical flow of melting and refreezing of these ice-sheets are the real danger to our planet’s normal seasonal cycles.
One of the founders of the eco-fascist movement, James Hansen, co-authored a study wherein he pointed out that it was not man-made CO2 that was causing global warming. Hansen wrote: “Our estimates of global climate forcings indicate that it is the non-CO2 GHGs that have caused most observed global warming.”
Hansen is one of the most vocal of the climate change alarmists. Considering that he is lying about the effects of man on the planet’s temperature, he is also one of the most prevalent purveyors of propaganda in recent times.